Species vrs Kind (Research Article)

Species vrs Kind (Research Article)

As mentioned in the preceding article of this series, one of the frequent accusations made against creationists by evolutionists is that Noah could not have fit all the animal species on the Ark.  Considering there are around 6.5 million land animal species known to science, this would be a fair accusation if the word “kind” … Continue reading Species vrs Kind (Research Article)

A Very Angry Millennial

A Very Angry Millennial

Editors Note: Matt Walsh, who we have written about before in his attacks on a young earth, went after Ken Ham and Answers in Genesis in a very unsporting, angry, arguably arrogant live stream recently. Since we've discussed this before, we won't recover old ground, instead covering the harsh accusations Walsh hurled at Answers in … Continue reading A Very Angry Millennial

Why Kind Over Species? (Research Article)

Why Kind Over Species? (Research Article)

It is certainly fair to question why the Biblical kind is a better concept than any given species concept. After all, the species idea has been around for centuries and has been functional for the purposes of science, at least so we have been told. That being the case, why should we replace it with this new, Biblical kind model that has never been used for science? That is a fair question. It raises a very interesting point. Are species even real?