As mentioned in the preceding article of this series, one of the frequent accusations made against creationists by evolutionists is that Noah could not have fit all the animal species on the Ark. Considering there are around 6.5 million land animal species known to science, this would be a fair accusation if the word “kind” … Continue reading Species vrs Kind (Research Article)
Editors Note: Matt Walsh, who we have written about before in his attacks on a young earth, went after Ken Ham and Answers in Genesis in a very unsporting, angry, arguably arrogant live stream recently. Since we've discussed this before, we won't recover old ground, instead covering the harsh accusations Walsh hurled at Answers in … Continue reading A Very Angry Millennial
One of the more recent concepts to come out of the creation science movements was the concept of mediated design. This concept has not gained a great deal of popularity as yet in creation circles but only was first proposed back in 2003 by Dr. Todd Charles Wood so it had time to be evaluated. … Continue reading Mediated Design
Disclaimer, this might be a bit of a rant and is not my normal style. Our Christianity in America is dead. It's not dying, it's not sick, it's dead. The corpse just hasn't collapsed into the grave yet. And if you think that's an extreme statement, buckle up because I'm going to say a lot … Continue reading Our Shallow Christianity
It is certainly fair to question why the Biblical kind is a better concept than any given species concept. After all, the species idea has been around for centuries and has been functional for the purposes of science, at least so we have been told. That being the case, why should we replace it with this new, Biblical kind model that has never been used for science? That is a fair question. It raises a very interesting point. Are species even real?