It is certainly fair to question why the Biblical kind is a better concept than any given species concept. After all, the species idea has been around for centuries and has been functional for the purposes of science, at least so we have been told. That being the case, why should we replace it with this new, Biblical kind model that has never been used for science? That is a fair question. It raises a very interesting point. Are species even real?
I had a remarkable experience today which has sent me researching grasshoppers and physics. As I was leaving the parking lot of my work, I noticed a bright green grasshopper resting on the hood of my car. I didn't pay that much attention to it, figuring it would get blown off as my car sped … Continue reading Physics and Grasshopper Legs
A very interesting news item appeared on Fox News and a few other websites around the internet recently that caused me to take a second look. The article announced that some Chinese genetic researchers had been able to produce baby mice without any need for a male mouse. If this claim is true, then they've … Continue reading Chinese Mice
As mentioned in the preceding article of this series, one of the frequent accusations made against creationists by evolutionists is that Noah could not have fit all the animal species on the Ark. Considering there are around 6.5 million land animal species known to science, this would be a fair accusation if the word “kind” … Continue reading Species vrs Kind (Research Article)