The question of character choice, particularly for statistical baraminology, is one I’ve been mulling over for a while. That proper character selection can have a massive impact on the outcome of a baraminological study should be obvious from the very first application of statistical baraminology by Robinson and Cavanaugh back in 1998. Using DNA, ecological, karyotypic and morphometric data, they lumped apes and humans into the same baramin. Given human uniqueness according to the Bible (Genesis 1:26-28), this is an impossible result.
Author: inhisimagegenesis
Birth Control
One of the topics we covered in our three-part series on America’ s turn towards moral degeneracy was the acceptance … More
Examples of Evolution Debunked Pt 4
In case you’ve missed it, we’ve been working on a multipart series debunking a list of supposed examples of evolution. … More
Reevaluating Natural Selection
Animals with deleterious mutations were less likely to breed and pass on their mutations. This is a sort of differential reproduction but at the organismal level. It is foolish to speak of natural selection at the genetic level, but at the organismal level, it makes more sense.
